|
SHOSTAKOVICH Sonata
for Violin and Piano. Jazz Suite No. 1 (trans. M. Gluzman). AUERBACH
Sonata No. 2 for Violin and Piano. Lonely Suite
Vadim Gluzman (vn); Angela Yoffe (pn) BIS CD-1592 (67:16)
Lera Auerbach is a remarkably gifted woman, now in her
mid 30s. Born in Russia, she immigrated to the United States in 1991,
earning degrees in both piano and composition from Juilliard, working
with Joseph Kalichstein and Milton Babbitt respectively. Although it
strains credulity, at the age of 12 she is said to have composed an
opera that was performed throughout Russia. In addition, she is a writer,
with two published novels and several volumes of poetry to her credit.
In 1996 she was named Poet of the Year by the International Pushkin
Society.
One of a surprising number of younger composers who emerged from study
with Babbitt with their allegiance to tonality intact, Auerbach has
pursued a musical language reminiscent—based on the few pieces I have
heard—of late Shostakovich. That is, although it may display clear tonal
centers, there is plenty of harmonic dissonance and emotional extremism—an
approach more common among eastern-European composers than among, for
example, Americans.
Lonely Suite is a ballet suite scored for violin solo, and dating
from 2002. Although I generally find unaccompanied violin to be one
of the less rewarding media embraced by western classical music, this
suite of what are essentially six “preludes,” or character-pieces, each
of approximately two-minutes duration, and each evoking a different
mood or image, is pretty successful in holding the listener’s interest
without the presence of a choreographic dimension. The music is masterfully
shaped for the instrument, idiomatically drawing upon a wide range of
traditional devices to produce a fair range of expressive variety. The
work is dedicated to violinist Vadim Gluzman, who has a history of involvement
with Auerbach’s music, and his extraordinary playing certainly justifies
her choice of dedicatee.
Auerbach’s Sonata No. 2 for Violin and Piano was composed the previous
year, and bears the subtitle, “September 11.” Auerbach has lived in
New York City since her arrival in this country, and describes herself
as “a passionate New Yorker.” Begun on September 12, 2001, the 15-minute
work consists of one vehement, hard-edged movement that suggests agitated
horror, detached disbelief, and a numb sense of grief. It is more a
music of gestures and episodes than of developmental thrust, but each
episode is shaped with considerable sensitivity and skill. Auerbach
is fortunate in having her music represented by such impeccable artists
as the husband-and-wife team of Israeli violinist Vadim Gluzman and
Latvian pianist Angela Yoffe.
The two Auerbach works are balanced by two compositions of Shostakovich
that illustrate the polar extremes of the Soviet composer’s expressive
range. Jazz Suite No. 1 was written in 1934, for a Soviet competition
intended to “raise the quality of jazz.” Let’s get real here: This piece
has as much to do with jazz as, say, Samuel Barber’s Souvenirs
does. In fact, it is the Barber diversion that this piece most frequently
calls to mind, with its “potted palm” salon atmosphere. As such, it
reveals some taste and skill—how could it not? After all, its composer
had enough pride and self-respect to do a professional job at whatever
he touched. Though originally scored for “jazz band,” the suite is heard
here in a competent, idiomatic arrangement for violin and piano done
by the violinist’s father Michael Gluzman.
The Sonata for Violin and Piano is, of course, one of the searing masterpieces
of Shostakovich’s later years. Composed in 1968 for David Oistrakh,
who was joined by Sviatoslav Richter in the premiere, it comprises two
gruelingly somber, passacaglia-like outer movements—each incorporating
some serial elements within a generally tonal context—flanking an Allegretto
that explodes with a savage brutality which Shostakovich was unrivaled
in his ability to evoke. Gluzman and Yoffe play this work with razor-sharp
precision and tremendous aggressive intensity. However, as brilliant
as this performance is, the fact is that the sonata’s technical and
interpretive demands are relatively unambiguous, and the work has attracted
a number of great, serious violinists. Hence, starting with Oistrakh
and Richter, the sonata has enjoyed quite a few hair-raising recorded
performances. This latest is as good as most others I have heard.
Walter Simmons
© Fanfare 2007
|